Two decades after we first creaked open the doors to the castle and took to the skies on our brooms, it remains to be seen whether there's still an appetite for the Wizarding World. Then again, I still find myself pining for Malfoy and his snivelling PS1 one-liners.
has managed to drum up some new interest in Hogwarts Legacy, and even a grizzled ol' Filch like me will admit it doesn't look as bad as I thought it would. Hogsmeade looks like an okay way to pass the time, while a "build your own homestead" idea is The Sims with magic, but ultimately, Hogwarts Legacy feels a bit like the devs have thrown everything at it in the hopes something will stick.Īt least Warner Bros.
There are no microtransactions in Hogwarts Legacy." That's all well and good for now, but with the business model of microtransactions seemingly already in place, how long will WB stick to its wands before the Dark Lord's greed sneaks in?īeing able to explore new crevices of the castle we think we knew so well will be interesting, and as an aside, I'm pumped to see the golden bathroom that the movies cut from Goblet of Fire. Posting on Twitter, Wood explained, " We've seen this question coming up and want to set the record straight. Then again, Community Manager Chandler Wood has reassured already irate players that microtransactions won't be part of their Hogwarts Legacy experience. How the Room of Requirement works is the biggest leftover question of the reveal (apart from what's going on with multiplayer), with fans being told it will sense what you need. The idea of microtransactions is almost as irritating as the Herbology teacher that says, "Class, please welcome the newest rose in our garden." Alongside getting what you need from shops in Hogsmeade, another line refers to being able to "loot, buy, or craft your own magical gear" - sounds pretty microtransaction-y to me.
0 kommentar(er)
